JoeyandDavid Posted May 20, 2006 Report Share Posted May 20, 2006 Coast Guard officers removed the captain from a Celebrity cruise ship in Seattle on Friday afternoon after he failed a breath-alcohol test during a routine safety inspection. Friday afternoon, a Coast Guard inspector "noticed alcohol on the captain's breath," Petty Officer Tom Winter said. A team of additional inspectors from the Coast Guard's Seattle Sector boarding team were called to the scene to administer the breath test -- and found the captain to be under the influence of alcohol, Winter said, with a blood-alcohol content level above 0.040, the federal limit for operating a vessel in U.S. waters. The company said the captain would be fired. The staff captain assumed command, said Michael Sheeham, spokesman for parent company Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. The Mercury, which has a capacity to carry 1,884 passengers, was delayed in port at Pier 66 for more than an hour before departing at 6:30 p.m., under the direction of another captain. Such incidents are rare, Coast Guard officials said. "Certainly, we've dealt with other intoxicated boaters before," said Winter, of the Coast Guard's District 13 office. "But I can't think of any other similar incident involving the captain of a vessel this large." The incident prompted a Coast Guard investigative team to be dispatched from the Jackson Federal Building downtown to the cruise ship. The team boarded the vessel, Winter said, and sailed with the ship to the pilot station at Port Angeles. The cruise company's policy forbids any officer from consuming alcohol within eight hours of reporting for duty, Sheeham said, noting that Royal Caribbean's policy is twice as stringent as international maritime regulations. "The captain's actions are totally unacceptable. He has been stripped of his command and ordered off the ship," said Dan Hanrahan, president of Celebrity Cruises, in a statement. "Any shipboard employee, from the captain down, will be dealt with as swiftly and severely." Celebrity Cruises sails weekly during spring and summer from Seattle to Alaska from the Bell Street Pier Cruise Terminal at Pier 66, where the ship was moored during the incident. The Coast Guard said the cruse line fully cooperated with the investigation. Lt. Cmdr. Rick Rodriguez of the Coast Guard said the captain was being investigated for operating a commercial vessel under the influence of alcohol, which is a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in prison. Federal law considers someone operating a vessel legally intoxicated if his or her blood-alcohol concentration level exceeds 0.040. "This incident should send a clear message to all mariners operating in U.S. waters that operating any vessel under the influence of drugs or alcohol is a serious threat to the safety of other mariners, the general public, and maritime commerce and transportation," Rodriguez said in a statement. "Such behavior will not be tolerated, and violations will be enforced to the fullest extent." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This report includes information from P-I staff and The Associated Press. © 1998-2006 Seattle Post-Intelligencer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GottaCruz Posted May 20, 2006 Report Share Posted May 20, 2006 wow, Joey. thanks for posting this. It's amazing that they were able to get another captain so quickly. Good thing that he was relieved of his job before something terrible happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeyandDavid Posted May 20, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 20, 2006 Cheryl they promoted the second in command who was already on board who was also Certified to command a vessel… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mebert Posted May 20, 2006 Report Share Posted May 20, 2006 JoeyandDavid, Thanks for the information. I'm sailing on the Mercury next month and don't need for a alleged alcoholic to be operating the ship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbond Posted May 20, 2006 Report Share Posted May 20, 2006 He's not an alleged alcoholic, unless you've found some other information. His blood alcohol level was above the required maximum, which is quite low. Drinking doesn't mean that you are an alcoholic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.